When we consider the new testament manuscripts we should ask why the gospels are placed before the epistles? The Epistles pre date them. This appears to be a deception of the canon. Factually, Galatians is our oldest manuscript the text upon which is our Foundation. It is our constitution as Christians and is all we need!
The idea of Galatians being abrogated by the gospels is invalid as they're collected folklore and not a direct revelation as to Paul. Revelation can be seen in the scope of direct revelation yet any attempt to abrogate Paul is merely a contradiction of Paul. A Prophet may only abrogate their own revelation or else stand in contradiction.
Comments