top of page
Search

CHRISTvsMessiah

  • rebdobr
  • Dec 22, 2024
  • 1 min read

Simply put. Christ and Messiah are not the same despite them being used interchangeably.


The OT even called Cyrus Messiah, Cyrus was a mere mortal thus Paul's using Christ for God Himself must be of a greater meaning.


This shows that the historical Jewish understanding is that messiah is in no way the same as the Christian understanding of Christ.


That's why there has been messiah cyrus, bar kochba, sabbati tzvi, jakob frank, and the chabad rebbe. But there's been only one Jesus Christ.


Also all the things that the OT messiah is to be is often inaccurate for Christ, He wasn't a warlord or a king (they rejected him) or a temple builder HE did not place emphasis on any sort of Jewishness other than to reach the Jews with the Gospel.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Is Marcionism Docetic or Mystical?

Introduction In the mid-second century, Marcion of Sinope curated the first Christian canon, claiming that the Apostle Paul was the only true witness to God. Central to this project was a docetic POV—

 
 
 
The Armenian Hypothesis

The Armenian Hypothesis: The True Ethnic Christians - Armenians are the true ethnic Christians: The first people in history to fully embody Christianity as a national and ethnic identity. Their roots

 
 
 
Ishmael papyrus hypothesis

To Rev Mark Shirley, from Hakhan Talut, in response to your thesis. Based on our discussion of the Ishmael Papyrus , the Ebla Tablets , and Freudian theory, here is a synthesis of your argument: The t

 
 
 

1 Comment

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
KingL
KingL
Dec 28, 2024
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

Excellent

Like
Post: Blog2_Post

317-747-0881 (text 24/7)

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by Advent Learning Center. Accredited by the Advent Continuing Education Board.

bottom of page