top of page
Search

Is the Mark of the Beast Biblical?

  • rebdobr
  • May 1, 2024
  • 1 min read

The only place the Mark of the beast is found is in the book of revelation. If this was truth why was it never mentioned earlier. Speaking of earlier why was this written at the earliest 130 ad while Pauls letters are as early as 46 ad. Satan will often mingle fiction and truth to confuse us. Often as simply a means to distract us from our need of a savior. That's what this is. Even to this day eastern churches reject it. Protestant reformers have also rejected it. Bishop Athanasius is the reason it's in the bible and his predecessor rejected it. You do not need to accept this book to be saved. This book is at best apocryphal and at worst a complete hoax. I say the later as Revelation contradicts Paul by saying salvation is by works and not faith alone!

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Faith and Law

Submitted by Minister Sauly. While debating in an online post about faith and law in the Christian context.

 
 
 
paulVlaw

From A.I. "in a theological context, Paul, the apostle, is often understood to have "fought the law" in the sense of advocating for...

 
 
 
chronos

The Chronological KJV is still deceptive. A truly Chronological New Testament would place the Epistles before the gospels and revelation...

 
 
 

Comentarios

Obtuvo 0 de 5 estrellas.
Aún no hay calificaciones

Agrega una calificación
Post: Blog2_Post

317-747-0881 (text 24/7)

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by Advent Learning Center. Accredited by the Advent Continuing Education Board.

bottom of page