top of page
Search

Is the Mark of the Beast Biblical?

  • rebdobr
  • May 1, 2024
  • 1 min read

The only place the Mark of the beast is found is in the book of revelation. If this was truth why was it never mentioned earlier. Speaking of earlier why was this written at the earliest 130 ad while Pauls letters are as early as 46 ad. Satan will often mingle fiction and truth to confuse us. Often as simply a means to distract us from our need of a savior. That's what this is. Even to this day eastern churches reject it. Protestant reformers have also rejected it. Bishop Athanasius is the reason it's in the bible and his predecessor rejected it. You do not need to accept this book to be saved. This book is at best apocryphal and at worst a complete hoax. I say the later as Revelation contradicts Paul by saying salvation is by works and not faith alone!

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Eucharist

The truth about the Eucharist is that Christ is very real and present! When you know this and truly accept this the act of Communion transcends from the memorial to the mystical! I motion that the Euc

 
 
 
Apocrypha

“Throughout Augustine’s works, the disputed books are used as nothing less than inspired canonical Scripture indistinguishable from the other books of the Bible, save only that they are not accepted b

 
 
 
Filioque

The addition of the filioque clause to the nicene creed by the western church aka the Catholic Church was a major reason that the unified Church broke into east and west i.e. Orthodox and Catholic, of

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
Post: Blog2_Post

317-747-0881 (text 24/7)

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by Advent Learning Center. Accredited by the Advent Continuing Education Board.

bottom of page